Content

/

Commentary

/

Rationalism and Divergent Sinomodernity

Commentary

Technology & Statecraft

Rationalism and Divergent Sinomodernity

October 6, 2026
The featured image for a post titled "Rationalism and Divergent Sinomodernity"

Moonshot AI, one of China’s largest artificial intelligence labs, unveiled its latest model Kimi K3 the day before Xi Jinping’s speech at the World AI conference (WAIC) in July 2026. It may have been pure coincidence, but the sequence of events struck a few in the U.S. as a definitive moment when something about the future of Chinese machine intelligence was revealed. “We should adhere to the principle of openness,” Xi said, and “seize this rare, historic opportunity to encourage open source, openness, collaboration and sharing.” While not a change in the established state perspective, many in the West believed that China would eventually have to move away from their open-source approach to keep up with the rising cost of rivaling frontier capabilities. The speech firmly established that China was not planning on changing anything anytime soon.

Encouraged by billions of dollars worth of compute vouchers and other support for small firms, Chinese labs and entrepreneurs have for the last few years pursued a strategy involving a multitude of labs releasing capable open-weight models, utilizing both highly innovative methods of development and distillation from American frontier models. Below these “foundation” models, there is a constantly shifting substrate of smaller firms that specialize intelligence for particular applications.

Though public statements from Chinese lab leads and the capabilities of their models are visible from America, an enormous delta exists between American rhetoric and the reality of Chinese AI. Only in discrete moments can the hazy fog of expectation be punctured by a jolt of undeniable reality.

Continue reading

Explore More Policy Areas

InnovationGovernanceEducation
Show All