The Senate can reduce dysfunction by adopting four reforms to its Standing Rules: limiting debate on the motion to proceed, prohibiting the majority leader from filling the amendment tree, authorizing a previous question motion, and requiring votes when debate ends. These reforms would make the Senate more efficient, ensure greater participation, and allow for more inclusive decision-making. This article focuses on the first proposal, presenting data on senators’ frustrations with the current approach, reviewing the rules governing debate on the motion to proceed, examining the Senate’s past handling of the issue, and outlining reform options before proposing rule text.
